Judiciary
Delhi Judicial Service (Main)- 2014
| Subject (Duration) |
Maximum Marks |
Time |
| General Knowledge and Language |
250 |
3.0 hours |
| Civil Law-1 |
200 |
3.0 hours |
| Civil Law-2 |
200 |
3.0 hours |
| Criminal Law |
200 |
3.0 hours |
Delhi Judicial Service (Preliminary)-2014
Subjects include General Knowledge,Language,Civil and Criminal law.
Two hundred Multiple choice questions,each question carries equal marks.
Test duration is 2 hours 30 minutes.
There is 25% negative marking for each wrong answer.
Actual questions asked in DJS-2014
1. Write short notes on following.
(a) Compensation for breach of contract.
(b) Injunction is a discretionary relief.
(c) Dower under Muslim Law.
(d) Temporary Injunction under the CPC.
(e) Plea-bargaining.
(f) Distinction between motive, intention and knowledge.
2. If a person sitting across to a girl in public transport deliberately shows a pornographic picture to her, it amounts to the offence of
(1) Voyeurism (2) Sexual Assault (3) Sexual Harassment (4) None of these.
3. " X" along with four other armed associates seizes the child of "Y" and threatens to kill him unless "Y" parts with his watch and diamond ring compelling him to do so."X" has committed the offence of
(1) Robbery (2) Dacoity (3) Attempt to murder (4) Extortion.
4. A decree becomes final when
(1) It conclusively determines the rights of the parties.
(2) No appeal has been preferred against the decree.
(3) Both (1) and (2)
(4) Neither (1) nor (2)
5. Mark the incorrect statement
A court may take the assistance of expert for forming opinion on point of
(1) Foreign law (2) Art (3) Both (1) and (2) (4) Neither (1) nor (2)
6. Plaintiff,a sports broadcaster in India,approached the court with the plea that it has exclusive Television Rights,Radio Rights,Mobile Transmission Rights and Broadband Internet Transmission Rights in respect of 2014 Cricket World Cup,which the plaintiff secured by making substantial investments.It is the case of the plaintiff that given the significant investments made by the plaintiff in aquiring exclusive Transmission Rights,it is imperative for the plaintiff to ensure that its exclusive and statutory rights are not infringed by the websites which have not made any investments in acquisition of such rights.
Plaintiff seeks ex-parte injunction against not only some known broadcasters and websites but also against unknown entities to restrain them from hosting ,streaming,broadcasting,rebroadcasting,retransmitting,exhibiting,downloading and so on.
Decide the prayer for ex-parte injunction.
For more questions asked in DJS or other states you may contact Delhi Law Academy,Dwarka.
" We do not have any Branch in India"
